A Congressman’s Take on Prop 1 (the so-called ERA)

Former Congressman Lee Zeldin speaks out about protecting girls/women and voting NO on Prop 1. 

Zeldin recently said in a post on , “On the November ballot in New York, Kathy Hochul and Albany Dems added Proposition 1, which would change the state constitution to establish a right for boys to compete in girls sports, access girls bathrooms, and change in girls locker rooms. Protect Women and Vote NO on Prop 1!”  Read the post HERE and make sure you “like” & “retweet it”.

Our Attorney Bobbie Anne Cox filed a lawsuit to keep Prop 1 off the November ballot. She won the lawsuit in the Supreme Court, but the Appellate Court reversed the decision. Now the Court of Appeals refuses to hear the case.   Attorney Cox agrees with Lee Zeldin and wants to protect girls/women sports.  Read her post HERE. Then “like” & “retweet it”.

For more information about Prop 1 and why you should vote “NO” click HERE.

Help stop Prop 1 from passing. Read HERE to learn how you can help.

Here is the Language that will be on the back of your November 5th ballot: 

Section 1. Resolved (if the Assembly concur), That section 11 of article 1 of the constitution be amended to read as follows:

§ 11. a. No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws of this state or any subdivision thereof. No person shall, because of race, color, ethnicity, national origin, age, disability, creed [or], religion, or sex, including sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, and reproductive healthcare and autonomy, be subjected to any discrimination in [his or hertheir civil rights by any other person or by any firm, corporation, or institution, or by the state or any agency or subdivision of the state, pursuant to law.

b. Nothing in this section shall invalidate or prevent the adoption of any law, regulation, program, or practice that is designed to prevent or dismantle discrimination on the basis of a characteristic listed in this section, nor shall any characteristic listed in this section be interpreted to interfere with, limit, or deny the civil rights of any person based upon any other characteristic identified in this section.

§  2. Resolved (if the Assembly concur), That the foregoing amendment be submitted to the people for approval at the general election to be held in the year 2024 in accordance with the provisions of the election law.

Explanation – Matter in underscored is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted.

Click HERE to read more about the Equal Rights Amendment and why you should vote “NO”. 

Share with your friends and family

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Telegram
WhatsApp
Email
Print

Sign up
for updates